A national standard for digital competence specifically designed for adult educators in Singapore, empowering them to thrive in the AI-driven future of work.
The rapid advancement of digital technologies and artificial intelligence is transforming how adults learn, work, and live. Adult educators are at the forefront of this transformation, yet Singapore's adult education sector lacks a common definition of digital competence that addresses the unique needs of adult learners and the AI-driven future of work. Without a shared framework, adult educators cannot identify their skill gaps, access competency-aligned professional development, or progress systematically in their digital capabilities.
The AE Digital and AI Proficiency Taxonomy (ADAPT) establishes a national standard for digital competence specifically designed for adult educators in Singapore. It provides:
This framework is designed for:
The framework is grounded in four principles:
Technology serves to enhance, not replace, the educator-learner relationship. Adult educators maintain agency and accountability in pedagogical decisions.
Recognising that adult learners are self-directed, bring rich prior experience, and are motivated by relevance to their professional and personal goals.
Ensuring digital technologies are used safely, ethically, and inclusively, with attention to accessibility, data privacy, and equity.
Supporting educators' continuous development as technology evolves, from foundational literacy to innovative leadership.
The framework addresses digital competence across four interconnected domains, each structured across three progression levels (Basic → Intermediate → Advanced), enabling educators to identify their current position and chart their development pathway.
This framework synthesises established international standards with competency design models to ensure rigour, relevance, and practical applicability.
| Framework | Contribution to This Framework |
|---|---|
| DigCompEdu (EU, 2017) |
Provided the foundational domain structure for educator-specific digital competencies and the concept of progression levels |
| UNESCO ICT-CFT
(UNESCO, 2018) |
Informed the integration of ICT competencies with professional practice and pedagogical transformation |
| UNESCO AI CFT (UNESCO, 2024) |
Guided the human-centred approach to AI integration and ethical principles for AI in education |
(Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001)
Ensures competency statements use cognitively appropriate action verbs:
(Dreyfus & Dreyfus, 1980)
Defines expected autonomy at each level:
How to read the statements: Each competency statement begins with level-appropriate verbs (shown in bold in the tables below) and ends with qualifiers (shown in italics) that indicate the expected level of autonomy, support, and scope.
Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives . Longman.
Dreyfus, S.E., & Dreyfus, H.L. (1980). A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition . Operations Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu . EUR 28775 EN. Publications Office of the European Union.
UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers (Version 3). UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2024). AI Competency Framework for Teachers . UNESCO.
Technology-enhanced andragogy for inclusive and learner-centred facilitation
|
1.1. Design & Planning
Designing and planning technology-enhanced learning experiences.
|
Basic
Applies established templates to plan
technology-enhanced learning activities, using digital tools
with guidance .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Designs blended learning experiences
independently , integrating diverse digital and AI
strategies to adapt to learner needs .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Architects innovative curriculum
frameworks with authentic learning experiences that leverage AI, guiding peers
through the design process and advancing professional practice .
Examples:
|
|
1.2. Implementation & Facilitation
Implementing and facilitating technology-enhanced learning.
|
Basic
Demonstrates structured lesson delivery
using digital tools, applying established protocols in
supervised settings .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Orchestrates diverse digital learning
scenarios, adapting facilitation strategies based on real-time
learner engagement patterns .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Pioneers innovative andragogical
practices using digital and AI tools, coaching fellow educators in advanced
facilitation and leading institutional implementation .
Examples:
|
|
1.3. Learner Engagement
Engaging and motivating learners by fostering creativity and
collaboration in digital and AI-enhanced environments.
|
Basic
Uses digital tools to initiate learner
interaction, applying structured collaborative learning protocols
with guidance .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Facilitates collaborative learning
systematically, selecting appropriate digital tools to foster
meaningful peer interaction .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Creates innovative collaborative learning
ecosystems that empower learners as co-creators with AI, supporting fellow
educators and enriching the field with evaluation findings .
Examples:
|
|
1.4. Support & Wellbeing
Supporting learners' wellbeing by promoting safe, legal, and
ethical use of digital technologies, including AI.
|
Basic
Recognises digital safety risks including
AI-related threats, applying institutional protocols and
referring learners to support services .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Implements safe, supportive learning
environments, integrating digital and AI wellbeing strategies
adapted to diverse learner needs .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Advocates for institutional digital and
AI wellbeing policies, coaching colleagues in creating supportive
environments and enabling learners to self-manage digital safety .
Examples:
|
Leveraging digital tools and AI for formative, summative, and personalised feedback
|
2.1. Design & Delivery
Designing and delivering digital and AI-enhanced assessments.
|
Basic
Uses digital tools to create basic
assessments, applying pre-defined templates and institutional
guidelines .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Designs diverse digital and AI-powered
assessment formats, selecting strategies that enhance feedback
quality based on learning objectives .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Develops innovative digital and
AI-powered assessment strategies, appraising them for authenticity
and fairness and advising colleagues on best practices .
Examples:
|
|
2.2. Analytics & Feedback
Using data and analytics from digital and AI tools to provide
feedback and improve learning.
|
Basic
Interprets basic data from digital tools
(e.g., quiz scores, completion rates), applying this information to
provide feedback following established procedures .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Analyses digital and AI-powered analytics
to identify learning patterns, providing timely, targeted feedback
adapted to individual learner needs .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Develops ethical, AI-driven feedback
systems, scrutinising data for bias and guiding colleagues in
analytics-informed practice .
Examples:
|
|
2.3. Learner Participation
Involving learners in the AI-enhanced assessment process.
|
Basic
Uses digital platforms for assessment
submission and return, applying structured processes according
to institutional procedures .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Facilitates learner participation through
AI-assisted peer review and self-assessment, integrating choice in
assessment topics or formats.
Examples:
|
Advanced
Empowers learners as assessment
co-designers through collaborative rubric development and shared ownership of
assessment processes .
Examples:
|
|
2.4. Ethical Data Use
Using learner data ethically and responsibly in AI-supported
systems.
|
Basic
Complies with institutional data privacy
and security policies, identifying personal and sensitive learner
data in AI systems .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Applies data protection principles
proactively, ensuring transparency in AI use and anonymising
learner data for analysis .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Advocates for institutional AI data
policies, appraising AI systems for fairness and involving
stakeholders in ethical decision-making .
Examples:
|
Creating, curating, and managing digital/AI resources, and fostering AI literacy
|
3.1. Digital & AI Literacy Development
Teaching learners foundational digital and AI literacy skills
and developing their understanding of AI and emerging technologies.
|
Basic
Explains digital tools and foundational
AI concepts to learners, demonstrating functional skills using
provided resources and examples .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Facilitates learners' critical use of
digital and AI tools for problem-solving, guiding them to evaluate
social and ethical implications systematically .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Develops curriculum frameworks that
systematically build learners' capacity as responsible digital innovators,
advancing new strategies within the professional field .
Examples:
|
|
3.2. Critical Evaluation & Information Quality
Evaluating the quality of digital resources and teaching
learners to critically evaluate digital and AI-generated information and media.
|
Basic
Applies established criteria (e.g.,
currency, authority, accuracy) to evaluate digital and AI-generated information,
using evaluation frameworks with guidance .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Evaluates digital and AI-generated
content systematically for accuracy and bias, instructing learners in
developing independent evaluation strategies.
Examples:
|
Advanced
Enables learners to autonomously evaluate
complex digital and AI-generated information sources, enriching professional
discourse on information and AI literacy.
Examples:
|
|
3.3. Resource Selection & Curation
Selecting and curating digital and AI-enhanced resources for
teaching and learning.
|
Basic
Locates and selects ready-made digital
resources for immediate teaching needs, organising them for future
use following established methods .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Curates organised collections of digital
resources, evaluating each for pedagogical value and sharing
with colleagues .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Develops collaborative curation systems
and strategies, enriching the professional community with high-quality
resources and guiding ethical AI use .
Examples:
|
|
3.4. Resource Creation
Creating and adapting digital and AI-enhanced resources.
|
Basic
Uses familiar tools to create digital
resources by modifying existing content, applying basic AI features
with appropriate attribution .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Designs accessible, interactive digital
resources, integrating multiple formats and AI tools while
applying accessibility and inclusivity principles .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Develops innovative, high-quality digital
resources leveraging AI, disseminating openly and coaching others in
resource creation .
Examples:
|
|
3.5. Ethics & Licensing
Understanding and applying copyright and licensing in relation
to digital and AI-generated resources.
|
Basic
Applies copyright rules when using and
sharing digital resources, distinguishing between copyrighted, openly
licensed, and AI-generated content according to guidelines .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Applies licensing frameworks responsibly
when managing digital resources, instructing learners about
copyright, plagiarism, and ethical AI use.
Examples:
|
Advanced
Formulates institutional policies for
copyright and ethical AI use, advising colleagues on licensing complexities
and advocating for open practices .
Examples:
|
|
3.6. Accessibility & Sustainability
Ensuring that digital and AI-enhanced resources are accessible
and sustainable.
|
Basic
Applies basic accessibility features
(e.g., alt-text, captions) to digital resources, responding to
learner requests using AI tool assistance .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Designs accessible resources proactively
using inclusivity principles, selecting AI tools that support
inclusivity and cultural relevance .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Advocates for institutional accessibility
policies, coaching colleagues in inclusive design and evaluating AI
tools for equity and access .
Examples:
|
How adult educators use digital and AI tools for collaboration, communication, reflection, and professional development
|
4.1. Collaboration & Networking
Using technology-enhanced platforms to connect with peers, share
resources, and build professional communities.
|
Basic
Uses digital communication tools for
professional collaboration, participating in online communities
focused on AI in adult education by reading and responding to discussions .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Contributes actively to professional
networks, sharing resources and collaborating on
projects using digital tools.
Examples:
|
Advanced
Shapes professional communities
strategically, initiating collaborative projects and guiding
colleagues in effective AI use .
Examples:
|
|
4.2. Professional Learning & Growth
Engaging in online professional development and using digital
and AI tools to enhance professional practice.
|
Basic
Participates in guided professional
development on digital tools, identifying personal skill gaps
with guidance .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Selects relevant professional development
independently, integrating digital and AI learning into practice
and reflecting on impact .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Architects professional development
programmes on digital and AI practices, coaching colleagues and
advancing field innovations .
Examples:
|
|
4.3. Reflection & Leadership
Using digital and AI tools for self-reflection and demonstrating
leadership in digital contexts.
|
Basic
Records reflections on teaching practice
using digital tools, describing strengths and areas for improvement
after lessons .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Analyses teaching practice systematically
using digital evidence and AI analytics, adapting approaches
based on documented insights .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Leads institutional reflective practice
culture using AI-driven analytics, coaching colleagues in data-informed
reflection and driving pedagogical innovation .
Examples:
|
|
4.4. Ethical Engagement
Applying ethical principles in all digital and professional
interactions, especially concerning AI.
|
Basic
Complies with digital conduct, safety,
and data privacy standards, using basic security measures and
maintaining professional boundaries .
Examples:
|
Intermediate
Applies ethical principles proactively in
digital practice, selecting AI tools based on ethical implications
and guiding learners in responsible use .
Examples:
|
Advanced
Shapes institutional digital ethics and
AI policies, facilitating stakeholder dialogue and modelling
transparent, equitable practices .
Examples:
|
This glossary provides definitions for key terms used throughout the framework.